History and Story (3)

“May God decide which of us is right  Genesis 16:5 Eugene Peterson The Message

Is right– Sarai’s attempt to usurp God’s plan has the same consequences as Havvah’s enticement. Her life becomes much worse. Instead of fulfilling her desires for happiness, Hagar’s pregnancy brings humiliation, envy, and anger.  Now she must live with a servant whose body shows everyone her husband’s lack of moral integrity and her inability to provide an heir.  We see her anger in her confrontation with Abram: “Look at the violence you have done to me!  It’s your fault.”  Sarai tells Abram that she has lost face in this arrangement.  Hagar now thinks herself better than Sarai because she carries Abram’s child.  Her plan has backfired.  Instead of a life of fulfilled promise, she has inherited a life of shame.  No one can doubt Abram’s potency.  And now it is public knowledge that Sarai is infertile, a devastating position for a woman who is to be the mother of a great nation. The secret is out.  Public and private humiliation follows.

We need to pay close attention to the text here.  Notice that Sarai acknowledges that it was her plan to provide Hagar as a surrogate mother (“I myself gave my maidservant to you.”) but that does not relieve her discontent.  Hagar’s pregnancy conceives Sarai’s shame.  Sarai makes it very clear that the situation and its consequences are quite serious.  She says to Abram, “May Yahweh decide between you and me!”

It’s not obvious what this means.  Peterson translates it, “May God decide which of us is right,” but that doesn’t help much.  Right about what?  The context of Sarai’s statement is her complaint about humiliation.  She is angry with Abram.  In her opinion, he has not safeguarded her status.  Abram has let Hagar’s pregnancy affect hisemotional attachment.  Sarai sees that Abram is pleased that a child will be born to him even though it is not Sarai’s child.  This is humiliation beyond enduring.  So, she says to her husband, “God will decide if I am right (that I should have been cared for) or if you are right (that you showed favor toward Hagar).”  Sarai’s obvious implication is that there is no question who should come first—she should—and God will judge Abram for his misplaced devotion.

Once more sexual involvement backfires in the family of Abram.  Abram’s pattern, repeated by Sarai, is now the source of severe stress and deep emotional conflict.  Sarai fares no better as perpetrator of the plan.  She still ends up the victim.  We must notice that the drama that started out about a child has suddenly turned into a soap opera about the misguided plans of the woman. The child fades completely from the scene.  The real story is about Sarai’s self-identity.  In her mind, even though she got what she wanted, she lost what was important.[1]  She has been disgraced.  The Hebrew word she uses to describe the “violence” done to her is hamas. This is the only time in the Tanakh that this word describes an action done by a woman.  Sarai has been humiliated by her own gender, and worse, by her own slave.  The humiliation is not about the child; it is about the change in two relationships. First, her husband is no longer hers alone. And secondly, her status as the mother of the promised progeny is in doubt. She loses her present and her future.

Sarai appeals for justice.  Actually, she wants revenge.  But Abram refuses it.  After all, it was her plan and it is now his child.  Feeling even more slighted, she says that God will decide, throwing the judgment of Yahweh on Abram’s refusal to act on her wishes.  When Sarai offered Abram sex with Hagar, he was only too happy to comply.  Now that the circumstances have turned against her, Sarai finds that Abram is not so compliant.   Nothing seems to be going her way.

Topical Index:  Sarah, Sarai, Abraham, Genesis 16:5

[1]Although Yeshua makes no reference to this story, it is certainly a Biblical example of his remark, “The one who seeks to save his life shall lose it.”

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Laurita Hayes

I have been there! In Sarai’s shoes. I wanted all the right things, but because I doubted God’s ability, I ‘helped’ Him. The more I ‘helped’, the worse it got! I had to lose not only my distrust in God, I had to lose my trust in myself. All in the name of love, mind you. There seemed to be no flaw in the intent, but the method was flawed. Love does not begin with me. Neither do I have any ‘way’ to do it. Especially while I am being mad at God for NOT doing it!

Sarai had to lose her mistrust in God the hard way; by losing her own self trust. Then, and only then, was she fit to be the mother of a great nation. I notice that she did not boast when she DID have Isaac, like Eve did, that she had “gotten a man” in collaboration with the divine by leaving Abram’s cred in the dust.

Surely Sarai was proud that she was ‘in control’ of the promised nation, as a woman. Surely that pride was, in part, preventing that pregnancy. (Fertility cults were rampant, and it had to have been tempting, as a woman, to fall for fertility pride, and so take the place of God as a ‘source’.) Seeking credit that was not hers, however, she lost the credit she did have. Humiliation, after all, is what we get when we don’t practice the humility that can only come from trust in God. It is only when we stay in that trust that we are safe from that humiliation. Been there, done that. Today’s Word was my story, too: I suddenly found myself in Sarai’s shoes. Thanks, Skip!

Rich Pease

When human beings are left to their own devices, watch out!
Anything goes! And the campers don’t turn out very happy.
Learning there is a God and learning how to trust that God is
the whole package in this earthly lifetime. Nothing else comes close.
Abraham and Sarai are in the midst of their learning curves. Happy
they are not, still insisting on their own ways.
How patient God is with them. How patient God is with us!
Hold on dear Sarai. God has a better “way” then yours.
Maybe you could even get pregnant, too?!
Hold on.

Satomi

Thank God he had a ‘better way’ knowing full well how we tend to help Him (and able to justify it too!) when the promises He speaks to us are delayed. This morning reading about what these two women signify in Gal. 4:22-31 and Rev. 12 and I hear no blame in His voice for Sarah (Heb.11:11). As much as we have to painfully learn whenever we distrust His word to us yet when we turn to Him again, His mercies are new every morning.

baruch

yes new every morning

Judi Baldwin

Yet another example of “situational ethics,” as Sarai attempts to take matters into her own hands, just as her husband had done when he told the king she was his sister. Sarai, like most of us, had to learn the hard way…but she clearly learned. And, thankfully, God always follows through with His promises, in spite of our disobedience.
It pleases the LORD greatly when He sees us learning from our mistakes. He’s not as concerned with where we’ve been as He is with where we are going! Hallelujah!
And, once again, we see that “God justifies the ungodly. (Rom. 4:5)” Amen!!!

Lucille Champion

Thanks Judi… been a ‘week’ of weeks for me. Many different levels of “awe”! I appreciate your uplifting words…”he’s not concerned with where we’ve once been as He is with where we are going!” As much as I hold that close to my heart, I realize where I have been requires healing as only He can heal. Repentance! In unison with you, I say “HalleluYAH”! And in gratitude with lots of humility I embrace “God justifies the ungodly.” Shalom sister…

Judi Baldwin

I’m glad that phrase spoke to you Lucille. It did to me too when I first heard my rabbi say it from the pulpit. He says it often…probably because he knows we all need to be reminded of it…often.

Larry Reed

So much fodder for consumption ! We are his sheep, you know. I love that he refers to himself as The Good Shepherd. All we like sheep go (have gone) astray! By nature, it’s how we are. How easily we wander off from the protective custody of the good shepherd. If we are for their away from him then the length of his rod and staff, we are too far away ! That’s why I like One Peter 2:25. It clarifies our condition and gives us a solution. Return. Always returning. If I were ever going to write a book I would call it , “ return to the point of departure”. Because God in his incredible wisdom and righteousness takes us back to the point we went off. He’s a perfect Papa! He doesn’t do it to rub our faces is in it, or shame or condemn, but for our training! I’m sure at some point the prodigal son had to face up to the dynamics of his departure from the fathers home, also. God loves to give us understanding !
So this all really does fit with the story of Abraham and Sarah. God had a plan. He keeps working the plan in the middle of all the human variables! The whole time we are learning how to live in his rightness and we are learning more and more about the character, nature and ability of God.
Sidenote to Laurita. Thank you for your response to my questions a couple of days ago. Totally appreciate it and you. In your writing today you even said what I had stated in my questions for you . We can learn from one another because we have “been there, done that!”. How blessed we all are with each other. How blessed we are because Skip has chosen to follow God‘s direction in his life! We are beneficiaries! I continue to thank God for your input almost every day, Laurita. Rich treasures excavated from these earthly vessels !
Hallelujah, amen.

Mark Parry

Because we serve a God who is truth and suggests we walk in his truth (not our own) when we don’t we suffer for it. Isreal still is suffering nearly daily for the fruit of Sahrah’s rebellion and lack of trust in God to solve her problem or acomplish His will.

Laurita Hayes

And I think that lack of trust can also manifest in looking to other ‘sources’ for that truth. (That is what happened to me, anyway.) I believe the seduction of Hellenism for the West (the East has its own seductions to replace Truth) was that it replaced the Person Formerly Known As Truth with a Platonic ideal. The Truth stood in front of the one people primed to recognize Him; but, through long training in Greek intellectualism, I think they justified their rejection in the name of expedience, of which Caiphas spoke for all who were responding that way.

I think we – trained in that same school – can find ourselves doing the same if we are not careful. We can intellectualize ourselves right out of the room where Truth is reigning into the “outer darkness” where intellect can reign supreme on a throne of expedient ‘truths’ designed to ‘support’ paradigms unwilling to be shattered on that great Rock which is the Body’s only safe foundation for all us ALSO “living stones”.

May we, too, learn to be living, walking truth as our great Example was, and thus represent a real choice – a “savor of life unto life or of death unto death” – to the world. In the fight against evil, may evil be broken on us, instead of us being broken on it, and may we learn to crawl back down out of our heads and back into our whole experience and may that great Rock of Truth manifest in our lives (and hide us in this weary place) because we have learned to get out of His Way, is my prayer!

Mark Parry

It is in the PRESENCE that we are whole, the spirit and the mind engaged with and sensitive to the revelation of that PRESENCE that is TRUTH, LIFE, GRACE and MERCY. Each appropriately balanced in the moments of our lives through sensitive submission. This was the intent of our creator. Presence is the answer not our minds games that tend to distance us from that presence as we process cognitively instead of holistically=being wholly or holy his…