History and Story (4)

But Abram said to Sarai, “Behold, your maid is in your power; do to her what is good in your sight.” So Sarai treated her harshly, and she fled from her presence.Genesis 16:6  NASB

In your power – Abram is a man caught in the middle.  Not standing up for God’s promise in the first place has now landed him on ground filled with rage on one side and affiliation on the other.  But Abram knows the power of a woman’s wrath.  So, he takes the easy way out.  “Do what you want with her,” he tells Sarai.  In essence, Abram concedes to another demand from his wife.  If it didn’t turn out right the first time, there is no sense trying to make it right now. Just let the chips fall where they may. Sarai can abuse Hagar with his blessing.

Imagine any contemporary history that wished to portray the lives of the founding family of one of the world’s greatest religions.  Do you suppose that the lack of moral character, the indiscretions, the sexual barter and abuse of others would be included?  Do you think such actions would be the highlights of the story?  Yet, here it is.  The Bible glosses over nothing.  Abram shows the weakest moral fiber, swayed by the ranting of an angry wife.  Sarai displays a woman of fluctuating emotions, a pendulum swinging between manipulation and revenge.  Sarai’s abuse at the hands of her passive husband is now turned toward vengeance.  She knows that the passive Abram will not resist her demands.

So Sarai inflicts her anger on Hagar.  Hagar flees, determined to run as far as possible from a mistress who is as unpredictable as an evil wind.  But God intervenes, sending Hagar back into the storm.  In fact, Hagar is the only person who shows obedience to God in this entire debacle.  The Angel of the Lord says to Hagar, “Return to your mistress and accept ill treatment from her hand.”  And Hagar complies.  What a testimony to obedience she is.  Unlike the mother and father of the faith, Hagar shows what undeserved suffering at the command of the Lord really means.

Ishmael is born.  And for thirteen years, God does not visit Abram.  There is a lot said in this silence.  For thirteen years Abram and Sarai must face the consequences of their lack of trust in the promise of God.  For thirteen years they watch a child grow who is a constant reminder of their failure.  And for thirteen years, Hagar serves God by committing herself to submission under a hateful mistress.

Sarai’s next encounter with God reveals another character flaw.  God visits Abram and renews His covenant promise. To mark the occasion, God changes the names of both Abram and Sarai.  Abraham and Sarah now carry God’s name in their new names.  They are known by a new identity—an identity that comes directly from God Himself.  God leaves another permanent mark of His covenant—circumcision.  This mark is private and intimate.  It consecrates the male of the tribe to God’s promise.  It cannot be mistaken or reversed.  Abraham obediently follows God’s command.

Sarah re-enters the story during God’s next encounter with Abraham.  Accompanied by two angels who will soon rescue Lot from the destruction of Sodom, God accepts the hospitality of Abraham and eats a meal near Abraham’s tent.  God tells Abraham that He will return in one year and at that time Sarah will have already had a son.  Sarah has been listening to the conversation, hidden within the tent.  The account (Genesis 18) tells us that when Sarah heard this, she said to herself, “Now that I am worn out, shall I experience pleasure even though my husband is old?”[1]  The sense of this statement revolves around sexual pleasure.  It is not only her disbelief that she will have a child. This disbelief is contained in the word bala (“worn out”) – a reference to her inability to conceive due to age.  Sarah also says that she doubts she will experience “pleasure.”  Here the word is ʿednâ. This word is directly linked to Eden, the garden of delight, and has strong overtones of sexual pleasure. Sarah reasons that she is too old to conceive and no longer able to have sexual enjoyment with Abraham. Interestingly, she associates the word ʿednâ with the fact that Abraham is old.  Perhaps Abraham is not so virile either.  Her life has once more failed her.  She sees nothing wonderful in her future.

As Sarah contemplates this in her mind, she laughs about her impossible situation.  God (for who else can hear someone laugh silently) questions her about this disbelief. Sarah responds with a lie, “I did not laugh.”  Consider how ludicrous her attempt to cover her disbelief really is.  If this stranger can actually hear her thoughts, then it is fairly obvious that he will know when she is not telling the truth. The lie that she utters is not only disobedient, it is impossibly disrespectful.  In the middle of this dialogue is one of the most powerful verses in Scripture, uttered as a direct result of Sarah’s disbelief.  The visitor says, “Is anything too difficult for Yahweh?” Given the circumstances surrounding this rhetorical question, we could conclude that a change in perspective about life might be evident in both Abraham and Sarah.  But old patterns die hard.[2]

Topical Index:  bala, ʿednâ, Sarah, Mary, worn out, pleasure, Genesis 16:6

[1]Translated by Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 18-50, Eerdmans, 1995, p. 4.

[2]Contrast this reaction with the response of Mary when she is told that something impossible will happen to her body. Sarah’s response produces a future of anxiety and humiliation.  Mary’s response produces obedience and blessing.  Both women stand at a crossroads in their lives when they confront El Shaddai but the difference in their reactions demonstrates the results of two opposite choices.

Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Laurita Hayes

Thank you for updating this, Skip. I love the changes, too.

The most poignant point, to me, is the nice contrast between Sarah and Mary, and the differing outcomes. Obedience vs. disobedience can (and does) set the generational tone for a long time. how many of us disbelieve God (“laugh” in our “heart(s)”) and thus curse our children? Unbelief is an inheritable mindset. Isaac, as Skip brings out, must have struggled with his belief. I wonder if the incident on Mount Moriah was also a deliberate trauma designed to correct Isaac by forcing him to submit to the actions of his father’s belief in YHVH – to literally go under the knife – and viscerally experience grace as a result.

How many of us have also seen the knife of trauma – which has to be the highlight of Abraham’s family story for generations – shred our unholy foundations and force a naked confrontation with ourselves as well as with Whom we have to do?

Trauma, for me, forced a reckoning with all that I had been handed. I had to examine foundational mindsets that I would otherwise have passively accepted as my own paradigm without as much as even knowing why I believed what I believed. That trust got shattered because it was built on oh-so-human sand. I did not have to “tear down strongholds”: they got torn down for me! All the pieces lay on the ground; easy to see and isolated from all other pieces. “Trust issues”? Check. But, because shattered trust shatters the foundations, too, it can also be viewed as a precious opportunity to take out the trash of the past – to separate the sheep from the goats.

I think Isaac, unlike Ishmael, had a chance to reset the family dynamic for good as well. Trauma, after all, is a two-edged sword. It cuts both ways, for it brings both good and bad into question. Don’t judge Isaac too harshly for acting out his trauma. I think he was also resetting the good stuff because of it, too. Both his parents doubted God for his existence, as evidenced by how long they had to wait (probably to learn that faith is different from expectation or self confidence). Isaac at least suffered from neither expectations or self confidence, as far as we can tell, as his parents had to have cured those before his conception. He may have been the product of trauma, and his life may have been shaped by it as well, but the bad stuff got put in the trash, too, I think, in the process of him being forced to examine the foundations he came from.

May we learn early to embrace ALL the seeming disasters of life as the grace they can exhibit IF we can learn that being reset by new spiritual DNA must necessarily involve simultaneously ditching the old dynamic. People ‘rich’ in the intact identities set for them by their past inheritance may have a hard time threading their laden camels through those high passes, but those of us whose camels got shredded by the land mines back there in the valley of despair just have to figure out how to get our selves through that pass. We are promised new camels of identity, after all, in the Promised Land beyond that pass. May we, too, learn that we can safely leave all behind us (with rejoicing?) as we “press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus”. Phil. 3:14. Halleluah!

Brett Weiner B.B.( brother Brett)

Skip, I for one want to thank you for the years of study to release these in-depth teachings whether people accept them or not. You to learn from the spirit from study and meditation only comes from a love for God’s word. And to love God’s word is to love God. You are giving Priceless jewels thank you

Lucille Champion

The visitor says, “Is anything too difficult for Yahweh?” How much drama must I create to ‘get’ it? I speak these words often to others who are in despair, broken and hopeless. Intended to lift and encourage but do these words penetrate and stick? Looking at my own drama these words offer hope but do I really receive them in faith?

As Skip points out, “old patterns die hard” snaps me back to the ‘kingdom of self’. Back to the devices of creating drama and blaming YAH when it goes wrong. When does this end? Must YAH burn it all down to destroy the plague of lies that offer only death? Will I receive YAH’s sovereign authority over my life? Will I live for the Kingdom of YAH, whatever the cost?

‘Round and ’round the mountain of despair, murmuring and complaining it’s YAH’s fault I have failed. Am I ready to walk through the valley of Baka (Psalm 84) to surrender and receive the truth of who I am in YAH? Where is my heart’s desire?

Larry Reed

Good morning everyone! We seem to be confronted with situations on a regular basis that challenge The truth that nothing is too hard for God ! Maybe one of the greatest challenges is believing he is able to transform us, that he is overseeing our salvation.
Once again, if any of you have not purchased the book, “31 Days of Transformation” written by Skip and Laurita, I highly recommend it. I am coming upon truth and revelation that has the potential with time to transform. Reading day number 21 over and over and beginning to understand the dynamics involved in shame. Laurita writes, “…. The advantage of confessing my sin is that that point He can defend me; He can re-venge me; he can justify me. If I humble up and face the music; if I quit trying to run , Shame only exists in places where pride is still trying to keep a toe-hold. Repent for pride and shame will vanish, too”. When I realized, recognized and admitted or owned up to my sin something transpires and I am free. Like Laurita says, is a false sense of pride that keeps us in bondage because we don’t admit to what God has already spoken. Truth sets free. For some reason I had so much difficulty owning up to my propensity for incredible selfIshness. When I agreed with my Nathan ( The Holy Spirit) that “you are the man” I was free.
I refer then to Psalm 51 where David processes this whole dynamic . It had to be a turning point, a starting point to a new place in God for him. Admitting, “yes, you are God, are right ! Guilty as charged! As long as we cling to our own righteousness we cannot know His!
Thank you Skip and Laurita!
…… being transformed by the renewing of our minds ! Romans 12:1/Hebrews 4:12 -13.
Also 2 Corinthians 1:20 NIV

Larry Reed

Correction, day number 19, not 21. Thanks.

Rich Pease

We know the natural.
We have no insight or room for the supernatural.
Yet God works in the supernatural.
Learning that this is real and learning to trust that this
is how God operates, takes most of our lives to truly sort out.
God’s wisdom and love allows us to experience anything and everything
each of us needs in order to be ready to “see” His choice that stands before us.
“Come follow me,” Jesus said, “and I will make you fishers of men.” Matt 4:19
Impossible? (So Sarai laughed to herself . . .)

Mark Parry

Rich I agree with the addition, while God does act supernaturally he generally requires some natural act of obidiance on our part to be the launching pad for his miraculus interventions. We are often required to plant the mustard seed he trurns into a tree. In this story Abraham trims his wick and God makes the flame…

David White

According to the Chumash, the woman that Abraham married after Sarah’s death was actually Hagar. This makes sense when you consider that Isaac was living in the area with Ishmael and Hagar after the ‘akedah’ and we see that they remained in contact for when Abraham dies it is both Isaac and Ismael that bury him.

And Abraham again took a wife, and her name was Keturah
Genesis 25:1

Keturah is Hagar. Why is she called Keturah? For her deeds were [now] as pleasing as the ketoret (incense”.
Midrash Rabbah on verse

With this understanding, the dynamics of the family are much different than what is traditionally believed…so Skip you are correct…we often know very little about the characters that we believe to be so familiar.

Lesli

I appreciate the idea of contrasting these two women (see footnote 2) however I think the latter one had WAY more backstory and history with G-d than the former individual. No?

Mark Parry

I never made the connections between Abrahams cicumcision, his established covenant and his renewed potancy. The requirement of cicumcision has always been a mystery but it does have some health benifits regarding protections from some S.T.D.’s interesting effects for Sarah and Abraham. After all this willful self serving this painfull and humiliating act of obidiance just might have cleaned up the mess they both made of things..At least in some respects.